Metacognitive Reading Strategies of EFL University Students
Abstract
This present paper reports finding from a study dealt with the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students’ metacognitive reading strategies. A total of 68 students were selected enrolled in English department of private university in West Sumatra and they were asked to complete a survey. However, after analysing the data, only the data from 38 students as participants could be included in the report. In this quantitative survey, the instrument used to gather data was based on a Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS). The study’s findings revealed that the Global Reading Strategies was the most frequently used, followed by the Support Reading Strategies and the Problem-Solving Strategies. Furthermore, implications of the finding are discussed in relation to reading comprehension of foreign language teaching and learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afsharrad, M., Reza, A., & Benis, S. (2017). Differences between monolinguals and bilinguals / males and females in English reading comprehension and reading strategy use. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1037238
Alfarwan, S. (2021). Tertiary Level Saudi EFL Learners ’ Reading Strategies in Relation to Gender and Proficiency Tertiary Level Saudi EFL Learners ’ Reading. Reading Psychology, 42(6), 577–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888350
Alkhateeb, H. M., Abushihab, E. F., Alkhateeb, R. H., & Alkhateeb, B. H. (2021). Reading Strategies Used by Undergraduate University General Education Courses for Students in US and Qatar. Reading Psychology, 42(6), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1912967
Arabmofrad, A., Badi, M., & Rajaee Pitehnoee, M. (2021). The Relationship among Elementary English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Hemispheric Dominance, Metacognitive Reading Strategies Preferences, and Reading Comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 37(5), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846005
Bagri, G., & Dickinson, L. (2023). The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies and Trait Anxiety in Critical Thinking for a Verbal Reasoning Task. Reading Psychology, 44(1), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2022.2141391
Demorsy, S., Hanin, V., Colognesi, S., Demorsy, S., Hanin, V., & Colognesi, S. (2023). How do 12- and 13-year-old students respond to metacognitive questions ? Findings from math and science classes in French-speaking Belgium questions ? Findings from math and science classes in French-. Education 3-13, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2169049
Frid, B., Friesen, D. C., Frid, B., & Friesen, D. C. (2022). An Investigation of Reading Strategy Patterns Recruited by Bilingual Aduls and Children. 77(3), 212–233. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr-2020-0039
Gavora, P., Vaculíková, J., Kalenda, J., Kálmán, O., Gombos, P., Świgost, M., & Bontová, A. (2020). Comparing metacognitive reading strategies among university students from Poland, Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(7), 896–910. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1614545
Hong-nam, K., Page, L., Hong-nam, K. A. Y., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating Metacognitive Awareness and Reading Strategy Use of EFL Korean University Students. 2711. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.675418
Liao, W., Liu, M., Wang, Z., & Qin, K. (2022). Chinese expert teachers’ critical thinking strategies for professional growth. Professional Development in Education, 00(00), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2022.2097290
Lindholm, A., & Tengberg, M. (2019). The Reading Development of Swedish L2 Middle School Students and Its Relation to Reading Strategy Use. Reading Psychology, 40(8), 782–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1674432
Maghsudi, M., & Talebi, S. H. (2009). The Impact of Lingualuity on the Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness and Reading Comprehension Ability. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2009.11892672
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL Students’ Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.
Moradi, E., Ghapanchi, Z., & Pishghadam, R. (2023). A Probe into Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategy Use and Reading Comprehension Test Performance in Light of Emotioncy. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 53(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2121784
Muzdalifah, S., & Ahmad, S. (2015). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Among French Language Students : Is There a Different Between Genders ? 08(02), 13–28.
Nash-Ditzel, S. (2010). Metacognitive reading strategies can improve self-regulation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 40(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2010.10850330
Phakiti, A. (2003). A Closer Look at Gender and Strategy Use in L2 Reading. December, 649–702.
Razkane, H., & Diouny, S. (2022). Cognitive retroactive transfer of metacognitive reading strategies from English (L3) into French (L2) among trilingual learners. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2022.2144325
Rianto, A. (2021). Examining gender differences in reading strategies, reading skills, and English proficiency of EFL University students. Cogent Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1993531
Ro, J. (2023). Critical thinking in the national curriculum and teacher education in South Korea : a missing link. Teachers and Teaching, 00(00), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2023.2172393
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. 29, 431–449.
Talwar, A., Magliano, J. P., Higgs, K., Santuzzi, A., Tonks, S., O’Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2023). Early Academic Success in College: Examining the Contributions of Reading Literacy Skills, Metacognitive Reading Strategies, and Reading Motivation. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 53(1), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2022.2137069
Tan, C., Chen, C., & Lee, H. (2020). Effectiveness of a digital pen-based learning system with a reward mechanism to improve learners ’ metacognitive strategies in listening. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 785–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1591459
Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435547
Teng, M. F., Huang, J., & Teng, M. F. (2021). The effects of incorporating metacognitive strategies instruction into collaborative writing on writing complexity , accuracy , and fluency fluency. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 00(00), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1982675
Villanueva, J. M. (2022). Language profile, metacognitive reading strategies, and reading comprehension performance among college students. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2061683
Zhang, J., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). The effect of feedback on metacognitive strategy use in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2069822
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i4.538
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Suharni Suharni, Sesmiyanti Sesmiyanti, Lili Perpisa, Anisa Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.