Elin Fitriani, Melyann Melani, Syahrul Syahrul


This research was due to some problems found in the field. It has been done at SMA KEC X KOTO because most of the teachers of Senior High School still used traditional technique in evaluating students’ writing. The teacher assessed only the accuracy in the use of tense and word spelling, teacher crossed out of words that are considered wrong without giving an explanation and teacher gave assessments to students’ writing without clear criteria, so that the assessment was done subjective.
This research used descriptive quantitative research. The researcher used a questionnaires and documentation collect the data. The population of this research was SMA KEC X KOTO. The samples that English teacher at SMA N 1 X KOTO, SMA AL HIRA, SMA NURUL IKHLAS consist 10 teachers by using total sampling. The data were got through questionnaires consists 29 list question items that teachers must answer based on their opinion. To analyze the data, researcher used Likert Scale and then, to find out percentage of each item of questionnaire, the researcher used the formula by Sudijono p:f /n x 100% , after that researcher interpreted of the practicality percentage table.
The finding reveals that Brown’s rubric using students writing at SMA X KOTO is very practical. Mostly teacher respond to every statements such as the organization which consists of 8 indicators only answer strongly agree and agree. The interpretation table shows that the percentage of teacher’s mean score was 89%. Thus, the use Brown’s rubric as a tool in assessing students writing was very practical (86% - 100%). It is recomended for teachers to use Brown’s Rubric
Key word: Writing, Analytic rubric, Very Practical

Full Text:



Permendikbud No 21 tahun2016 tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah

Brown and Glasser, 1999; Gibbs and Rowntree,1999; Thorpe,2000) in Assessment for Learning (Learning and Teaching in Higher Educational, Issue 1, 2004-05.

Anthony.J Nitko(1996:4) in TheBookof Evaluasi Pembelajaran,Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Islam Kementrian Agama, Jakarta Pusat,2012.

Zainal Arifin,(2012), Evaluasi Pembe lajaran, Direktorat JendralPendidikan Islam Kementrian Agama, Jakarta Pusat

Setiadi Hari (2016) in Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Vol. 20, No 2, Desember

Nunan (2003) in Jurnal Bakti Sasrawati, Vol. 05 No. 02

David P.Haris,(1969),TestingEnglishAsa Second Language, (NewYork), McGraw-Hill

Oregon Literacy Plan, K-12 Writing Assessment, Developed by the Literacy Leadership State Team (LLST) in partnership withOregon Department of Education (ODE), p 15

Oregon Literacy Plan, K-12 Writing Assessment, Developed by the Literacy Leadership StateTeam (LLST)in partnership with Oregon Department of Education (ODE), p 15

Sara Cushing Weigle, 2002,Assessing Writing,( United Stateof America by Cambridge University Press), New York.

Harold S. Madsen, 1983, Techniques in Testing, Oxford University OPress, New York, P 120

Brown H. Duglas, 2004, Language Assessment; Principles and Classroom Practices, Library Of Congress Catalog

Lemi lestari on the title “ Validitas dan Praktikalitas Lembaran Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Materi Kingdom Platar Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik untu Peserta Didik KelasX SMA/MA.(Staf Pengajar jurusan Biologi, FMIPA, Unversitas Negri Padang) JEP Vol 2 No 2 November 2008

Arthur Hughes, (1989), Testing for Language Teacher, Cambridge University Press, New York



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 elin fitriani melyann melani, syahrul

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.