Comparison of Prefixes and Reduplication of Gorontalo Language and Atinggola Language
Abstract
This study examines the comparative form and function of prefixes and reduplication in Gorontalo and Atinggola languages using a comparative linguistics approach. This comparison aims to identify similarities and differences in morphological structure in both languages. Data were collected through interviews, observation, and documentation involving native speakers in Randangan District, Pohuwato Regency, and Atinggola District, North Gorontalo Regency. A total of 200 basic Swadesh vocabulary items were used as the primary analysis material. The research findings indicate that both languages have relatively similar morphological systems, particularly in the use of bound morphemes, such as prefixes, which contribute to verb formation. However, there are differences in their productivity and grammatical functions. Gorontalo has six types of prefixes and 20 forms of reduplication, while Atinggola has four types of prefixes and 25 forms of reduplication. Reduplication in both languages serves to express meaning, such as emphasizing intensity, adding meaning, and varying meaning. In general, this research contributes to the development of comparative historical linguistic studies and can be used as a reference in the conservation and development of regional languages in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdussamad, Z. (2021). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Makassar: CV Syakir Media Press.
Asmadi. (2016). Proses morfologis pada kultur bahasa etnis Samawa. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 2(2), 1–10.
Bauer, L. (1988). Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Booij, G. (2007). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chaer, A. (2008). Morfologi bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Islaqudin, M. (2019). Kekerabatan kosakata bahasa Jawa dengan bahasa Bali: Kajian linguistik. Jurnal Sapala, 6(1), 1–10.
Keraf, G. (1984). Tata bahasa Indonesia. Ende-Flores: Nusa Indah.
Novianti, N., dkk. (2024). Kajian morfologi dalam bahasa daerah. Jurnal Linguistik Nusantara, 7(2), 165–175.
Nurbaina, N., dkk. (2022). Morfologi dalam kajian linguistik modern. Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 5(1), 40–50.
Parera, J. D. (1991). Kajian linguistik umum historis komparatif dan tipologi struktural. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Pusposari, D. (2017). Linguistik historis komparatif. Malang: UB Press.
Ramayani, R. S. (2025). Komparasi variasi leksikal bahasa Rejang dan bahasa Melayu Bengkulu dialek Taba Sating. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 4(1), 225–235.
Ramlan. (2001). Morfologi: Suatu tinjauan deskriptif. Yogyakarta: CV Karyono.
Setiaji, A., Masniati, A., & Ridwan, R. (2019). Makna reduplikasi dalam buku pelajaran bahasa Indonesia kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 8(2), 100–110.
Simpen, I. W. (2021). Morfologi bahasa. Denpasar: Pustaka Larasan.
Siregar, M., dkk. (2023). Bahasa dan kebudayaan dalam perspektif linguistik. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 12(2), 155–165.
Subyantoro. (2020). Menjadi peneliti kualitatif bidang bahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i1.1857
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Aas Ome, Dakia N. Djou, Salam Salam

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


