Evaluating the CEFR Alignment of Reading Texts in Grade 11 English Textbooks

Rindi Yani, Musdizal Musdizal

Abstract


The alignment of English teaching materials with international standards was crucial in ensuring effective language learning, particularly under Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate the conformity of reading texts in the Grade 11 English textbook Bahasa Inggris: English for Change to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR), an internationally recognized framework for language proficiency ranging from A1 to C2. Fifteen reading texts, which were specifically selected from the textbook’s reading comprehension sections, were analyzed using a quantitative approach. Key textual features examined included word count, average sentence length, average word length, and lexical complexity to determine each text’s CEFR level. The analysis revealed a wide range of levels, from B1 to C2, with several texts exceeding the B1–B2 target level set by the Merdeka Curriculum. This inconsistency suggested a misalignment between textbook materials and curriculum expectations, which might have affected student learning outcomes. The study underscored the importance of systematic textbook evaluation to ensure all reading materials supported the intended language proficiency goals.


Keywords


CEFR, English Textbook, Reading Text, Merdeka Curriculum

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abidin, Z. N., & Hashim, H. (2021). Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR): A review on teachers’ perception & plurilingualism. Scientific Research Publishing, 12, 727–736.

Agus Rofi'i, S. V. (2022). Analisis kesulitan membaca teks bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas III di SD Islam At-Thahirin Kota Tangerang. Didaktik: Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang, 9(04), 2373–2383. https://doi.org/10.36989/didaktik.v9i04.1888

Al-Hadi, M. L., & Shah, M. P. (2020). Malaysian ESL teachers’ perception towards CEFR-aligned textbooks. International Journal of New Technology and Research, 6(10), 73–79.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Pearson Education.

Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.

Chou, M. H. (2022). Using literature circles to teach graded readers in English: An investigation into reading performance and strategy use. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 144–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1885412

Council of Europe. (1954). European Cultural Convention. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment – Companion volume with new descriptors. Council of Europe Publishing.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348

Efendi, T. A., & Sejati, D. B. P. (2024). Scrutinizing English proficiency of junior high school students based on CEFR. KOULUTUS: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 7(1), 1–12. https://ejournal.kahuripan.ac.id/index.php/koulutus/article/download/1109/737/46383

Eka Risna Sulistiani. (2024). Analisis isi buku ajar “Bahasa Inggris untuk Nusantara” kelas delapan berbasis CEFR level B1 (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/81908/

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Hulu, J. P. S., Telaumbanua, Y. A., Zega, R., & Waruwu, Y. (2025). Teachers’ perspective towards Platform Merdeka Mengajar in implementing Kurikulum Merdeka. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 6(1), 415–430.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kamil, D. (2023). Are they finely tuned? Mapping the CEFR level of the reading texts of the English textbook for grade 10 of Indonesian senior high school. EDUVELOP: Journal of English Education and Development, 6(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.31605/eduvelop.v6i2.2333

Kara, B. (2019). The effect of graded readers on reading comprehension skill of EFL students. Language Teaching and Educational Research, 2(2), 160–172. http://dx.doi.org/10.35207/later.554716

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 5 Tahun 2022 tentang Standar Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini hingga Sekolah Menengah. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/unduhan/CP_2022.pdf

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Little, D. (2006). The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39(3), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003954

Lopera Medina, S. (2015). The design process of a reading comprehension manual. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 17(1), 130–141.

Marshall, J. (2024). Introduction to comparative and international education. SAGE Publications Limited.

Nafi'ah, J., Faruq, D. J., & Mutmainah, S. (2023). Karakteristik pembelajaran pada kurikulum merdeka belajar di madrasah ibtidaiyah. Auladuna: Jurnal Prodi Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, 9(1), 13–22. http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/JBPD/article/download/11718/4696

North, B. (2007). The CEFR levels and the European Language Portfolio. Language Teaching, 40(2), 123–128.

Nugroho, T., & Narawaty, D. (2022). Kurikulum 2013, kurikulum darurat, dan kurikulum prototipe (2020-2021) atau kurikulum merdeka (2022) mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris: Suatu kajian bandingan. SINASTRA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa, Seni, dan Sastra, 1, 373–382.

Pijarnsarid, S., & Kongkaew, P. (2017). An analysis of the content words used in a school textbook, Team Up English 3, used for grade 9 students. International Journal of Research - GRANTHAALAYAH, 5(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i3.2017.1761

Prastowo, A. (2015). Pengembangan bahan ajar tematik terpadu. Pustaka Pelajar.

Pratycia, A., Dharma Putra, A., Salsabila, A. G. M., Adha, F. I., & Fuadin, A. (2023). Analisis perbedaan kurikulum 2013 dengan kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Komputer, 3(01), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.47709/jpsk.v3i01.1974

Putri Laili Wijiastuti. (2023). Analisis kesulitan membaca teks bahasa Inggris pada siswa kelas V MI Nurul Islam Penawangan Tahun Ajaran 2022/2023 (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta. https://eprints.iainsurakarta.ac.id/7652/1/SKRIPSI%20PUTRI%20LAILI%20193141004.pdf

Putri, E. P. (2023). Analisis kualitas tugas membaca pada buku teks bahasa Inggris kontekstual terbitan Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri merujuk pada kriteria CEFR (Tesis). Program Studi Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Bahasa dan Budaya, IAIN Surakarta.

Putri, E. U. (2023). An analysis of reading tasks quality in contextual English textbook published by Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri refers to CEFR criteria (Skripsi). IAIN Surakarta. https://eprints.iain-surakarta.ac.id/8678/1/28%2012%2023FIXXXX%20%20kirim%20gmail%20mis%20ika%20revisi%20skripsi.pdf

Rifiyanti, H. (2023). Implementing framework of CEFR for teaching English language in non-English study program. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency, 5(2), 76–88.

Tanto, F. R. (2023). Analisis tingkat CEFR terhadap elemen membaca dalam buku teks "Work in Progress" untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas kelas X.

Tomal, N., & Yılar, M. B. (2019). An evaluation of social studies textbooks in Turkey: A content analysis for curriculum and content design. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(2), 447–457.

UNESCO. (2020). Digital literacy in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373276

Van Ek, J. A. (1975). Threshold level English. Council of Europe.

Van Ek, J. A., & Trim, J. L. M. (1998). Threshold level 1990. Cambridge University Press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i4.1266

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Rindi Yani, Musdizal

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.