The Effectiveness of the English Language Speech Assistant Speak Application in Improving Students’ Pronunciation

Aurelia Nova Ramadyanti, Esti Kurniasih

Abstract


Pronunciation remains one of the most challenging skills for EFL students in Indonesia, particularly at the elementary school level where teachers often lack English expertise and class time is limited. This study examined the effectiveness of the ELSA Speak application as an AI-powered pronunciation learning tool in addressing these challenges. Using a true experimental design with pre-test and post-test measures, the study was conducted at UPT SD Negeri 79 Gresik involving nine sixth-grade students randomly assigned to experimental (n=5) and control (n=4) groups. The experimental group received three treatment sessions using ELSA Speak, while the control group followed conventional instruction. Results revealed a substantial and statistically significant improvement in pronunciation scores in the experimental group compared to the control group (p=0.016), with the experimental group demonstrating a dramatic gain from pre- to post-test (p<0.001). These findings indicate that ELSA Speak's features — particularly its accurate pronunciation modeling and real-time automated feedback — effectively compensate for the constraints of conventional EFL instruction in elementary settings. This study contributes novel evidence for the application of mobile-assisted language learning at the elementary school level in Indonesia, a context previously underexplored in the literature. Practically, integrating ELSA Speak into classroom instruction is recommended as a feasible and impactful strategy to enhance pronunciation learning, provided that device access and internet connectivity are adequately supported.


Keywords


EFL Pronunciation; ELSA Speak; Experimental Design; Mobile Learning; True Experiment

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Shallakh, M. A. I. (2024). Embedding artificial intelligent applications in higher educational institutions to improve students’ pronunciation performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(6), 1897–1906. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1406.31

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. In Wadsworth.

Aulia, U., Junaidi, H., Setiawan, D. I., Kurnia, P. S. D., Meidatuzzahra, D., Nirmala, I. R., Nadjib, H. R., Sari, M. P., Syilfi, R., Rakanita, Y., Astuti, N. H., & Larasati, R. D. (2024). Parametric statistics: Theory and action with SPSS applications. In CV. Media Sains Indonesia.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. In Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Emzir. (2021). Qualitative research methodology: Theory and application. In Prenada Media Group.

Fauziah, N., Aororah, Z. Z., Ramadhany, R. A., & Hamid, S. M. (2024). The impact of The English Language Speech Assistant (ELSA) application on students’ pronunciation skills. INTERACTION: Journal of Language Education, 11(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v11i2.26

Gunawan, J., Marzilli, C., & Aungsuroch, Y. (2021). Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research. Belitung Nursing Journal, 7(5), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.v7i5

Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S. (2018). A critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English speakers. Cognition, 177, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.007

Karafil, B., & Uysal İlbay, Ö. (2024). EFL instructors’ satisfaction with teaching English online at tertiary level. Participatory Educational Research, 11(2), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.24.20.11.2

Koh, K. L., & Ahad, N. A. (2020). Normality for non-normal distributions. Journal of Science and Mathematics Letters, 8(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.37134/jsml.vol8.2.7.2020

Lim, W. M. (2024). What is quantitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622

Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Thurasamy, R., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx.

Ngoc, D. T. B., & Dung, T. T. (2020). Key factors influencing learners’ oral fluency in English speaking classes: A case at a public university in Viet Nam. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 36(6), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.46.31

Rój, A. (2024). Different aspects of evaluating the speaking skill in secondary classroom. Shanlax International Journal of English, 12(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.34293/english.v12i2.7206

Si, P. (2019). A study of the differences between EFL and ESL for English classroom teaching in China. IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies, 15(1), 32–35. https://doi.org/10.21013/jems.v15.n1.p4

Sudaryono. (2022). Educational research methods. In Student Library.

Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods. In Student Library.

Team, E. (2022). My next words grade 6: Student’s book for elementary school. In Book Center, Education Standards, Curriculum, and Assessment Agency, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Wahyudi, S., Resci, M., Putri, D., Nadilah, S. P., & Marbun, N. (2024). Analysis of small sample hypothesis testing. ResearchGate.

Xu, L. (2023). The age effect in second language acquisition and its study design method. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8, 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v8i.4454




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i2.2073

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Aurelia Nova Ramadyanti, Esti Kurniasih

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.