A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Language Styles in the Main Characters’ Utterances in Bride Wars (2009) Based on Martin Joos’ Five-Style Framework
Abstract
This study analyzes the differences in linguistic style in Bride Wars (2009) using Martin Joos' (1967) Five Styles of Speech as a guide. The study employs a descriptive qualitative design to examine 45 curated statements from the film through the documentation method. There were five types of information: frozen, formal, consultative, casual, and intimate. This was done according to Joos' rules for language. Some of these are the level of formality in the conversation, the words used, the way feedback is given, and how close the people are to each other. The results show that the most common style is casual (40%), then consultative (22.22%), intimate (20%), formal (13.33%), and frozen (4.44%). The results show that changes in the film's style are mostly due to changes in emotions and relationships, not changes in the institution's hierarchy. You can be sarcastic and fight in a casual way, but you can also show that you're friends and close. Being formal doesn't mean you're in charge; it means you're not close to someone. People still talk to each other at work the same way. In scenes of reconciliation, the intimate style is very clear, which shows that things are back to normal between the two people. People don't use frozen style very often, and when they do, it's only in formal settings. The research shows that language style is a dynamic continuum and a useful sociolinguistic tool for figuring out where you fit in film discourse.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Androutsopoulos, J. (2018). Online data collection. In C. Cotter & D. Perrin (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 233–249). Routledge. (https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694344)
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
Bednarek, M. (2018). Language and television series: A linguistic approach to TV dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics, 130, 107–120. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.04.006)
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). The discourse of television news. Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 12–23. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.006)
Boggs, J. M., & Petrie, D. W. (2016). The art of watching films (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. (https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407)
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Dynel, M. (2018). Irony, deception and humour in film discourse. Pragmatics & Society, 9(1), 1–26. (https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00001.dyn)
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Blackwell.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (2019). The discourse reader (3rd ed.). Routledge. (https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838281)
Joos, M. (1967). The five clocks. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2019). Understanding politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 145, 91–102.(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.002)
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Montoro, R. (2020). Stylistics and film dialogue. Language and Literature, 29(4), 363–378. ](https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947020958231)
Spolsky, B. (1998). Sociolinguistics. Oxford University Press.
Tagliamonte, S. A. (2020). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Language in Society, 49(3), 445–450. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000254)
Trudgill, P. (2000). Sociolinguistics: An introduction to language and society (4th ed.). Penguin.
Wales, K. (2014). A dictionary of stylistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2021). An introduction to sociolinguistics (8th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Yule, G. (2010). The study of language (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i2.2224
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Mieyrandha, Olga Dona Retsi, Tutik Haryani, Laura Meylinda Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
