English Students’ Perceptions of Using Machine Translation Yandex Tools in Final Project Writing

Agdelailyna Safitri Sekar Nur Setianti, Kushardiyanti Novinda

Abstract


The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine translation (MT) tools, has increasingly influenced the academic writing practices of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. This study explored EFL students’ perceptions of using machine translation, specifically Yandex Translator, in completing their undergraduate final projects. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed involving eighth-semester students of the English Education Program at Universitas Negeri Semarang. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings indicate that students generally view machine translation as a useful and accessible tool for academic writing. Participants reported using Yandex Translator to understand unfamiliar vocabulary, improve grammatical accuracy, interpret academic sources, paraphrase texts, and organize ideas more effectively. They also perceived that the tool helped increase their confidence and supported the overall writing process. However, several challenges were identified, including inaccurate contextual translations, overly literal renderings, and the risk of excessive dependence on the tool. Despite these limitations, students considered machine translation beneficial when used critically and combined with their own language knowledge. The study concludes that machine translation can effectively support EFL students’ academic writing, although careful human evaluation remains essential to ensure accuracy and academic quality.

Keywords


Students’ Perceptions Machine Translation; Academic Writing; Final Project Writing Translation Tools;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adawiyah, A. R., Baharuddin, B., Wardana, L. A., & Farmasari, S. (2023). Comparing Post-Editing Translations by Google NMT and Yandex NMT. Teknosastik, 21(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v21i1.2339

Alm, A., & Watanabe, Y. (2022). Online Machine Translation for L2 Writing Across Languages and Proficiency Levels. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(3 Special Issue), 135–157. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v5n3.53si3

Asmara, D. S. M., & Kembaren, F. R. B. (2024). Student’s Perception Towards the Use of DeepL Translator in Writing Thesis or Journal for English Education Students. Ijlecr - International Journal of Language Education and Culture Review, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.21009/ijlecr.v10i1.47937

Ata, M., & Debreli, E. (2021). Machine translation in the language classroom: Turkish efl learners’ and instructors’ perceptions and use. IAFOR Journal of Education, 9(4), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.9.4.06

Chéragui, M. A. (2012). Theoretical overview of machine translation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 867, 160–169.

Comelles, E., & Laso, N. J. (2025). The impact of MT as a writing tool on EFL academic writing: A qualitative linguistic analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 69(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101231

Khatim, M. S. Al. (2022). Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Perspectives toward Computer-aided Translation Tools and Machine Translation: A Case Study of Students of the English Department. Arab World English Journal. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no3.33

Klimova, B. (2025). Use of machine translation in foreign language education. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2491183

Mentari, D. (2025). Evaluating Machine Translation of Cultural Terms: Readability Comparison Between Google and Yandex. Buletin Al-Turas. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v31i1.44469

Nusantara, B. A., & Izzah, N. (2024). Exploring the use of translator applications: do they improve English language learners’ skills? JEEYAL (The Journal of English Teaching for Young and Adult Learners), 03(01), 1–8.

Rahmawati, S., Baihaqi, A., & Imtihanudin, D. (2025). Students’ Perception of Using Machine Translation: A Survey of Indonesian EFL Undergraduate Students. Journal of English Language Teaching and Cultural Studies, 8(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.48181/jelts.v8i1.28792

Sagita, M., Balqis, N., & Ghafur, U. J. (2021). 3 1,2,3. 8(1), 26–40.

Scott, A. M., Forbes, C., Clark, J., Carter, M., Glasziou, P., & Munn, Z. (2021). Systematic review automation tools improve efficiency but lack of knowledge impedes their adoption: a survey. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 138, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.06.030

Skripsi, A. (2025). Students ’ Perception Of Using Machine Translation Technology In Efl Writing.

Tan, Z., Wang, S., Yang, Z., Chen, G., Huang, X., Sun, M., & Liu, Y. (2020). Neural machine translation: A review of methods, resources, and tools. AI Open, 1(November 2020), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2020.11.001

Trang, N. M. (2024). Common Online Technical Tools for Translation: Students’ Choices, Perceptions, and Translation Strategies Used. European Journal of Multilingualism and Translation Studies, 4(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejmts.v4i1.533

Wang, H., Wu, H., He, Z., Huang, L., & Church, K. W. (2022). Progress in Machine Translation. Engineering, 18, 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2021.03.023

Wang, Y., Yang, K., Lin, H., Yang, X., Wen, K., Ren, J., Chai, Z., Guo, S., Gray, S. Z., & Estigoy, E. B. (2025). A Study among Chinese Engineering Major Students’ Perceptions, Intentions and Practices of Translation Software in Learning English. Procedia Computer Science, 265, 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.07.159

Yang, H., & Liu, M. (2024). Machine Translation Use in English Academic Reading and Writing : From the Perspective of Technology Acceptance Model. 465–471.

Yang, Y., Sun, H., Wan, Y., Mingyang, Cao, T., Huang, Y., & Estigoy, E. (2023). The Need to Use Translation Software in the Classroom: Perception of Chinese International Engineering College Students in Language Learning. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2023/v25i111030

Yuasa, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2025). EFL students’ engagement in machine translation-assisted writing: Scale development and validation. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4(3), 100260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100260

Yudianto, H., Surtikanti, M., & Agung, A. (2025). Students’ Viewpoint of Automatic Translation Tools in EFL Classroom. Pedagogy : Journal of English Language Teaching, 13(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.32332/joelt.v13i1.10482

Zona, F., & Kusmaryani, W. (2025). The Use of Machine Translation Tools in EFL Students ’ Writing. 13(1), 131–142.

Zuhriah, N., Fatoni, M., Verina, N., & Putri, W. (2024). Student Perceptions : Challenges and Opportunities of Using Grammarly on Thesis Writing. 5(December), 91–101.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i3.2626

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Agdelailyna Safitri Sekar Nur Setianti, Kushardiyanti Novinda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.