THE DEVELOPMENT MODEL OF ASSESSMENT WRITING BASED ON AUTHENTIC

Masrul Masrul

Abstract


The destination of the research is to pattern a model of English learning assessment writing based on authentic for teacher and students of Senior High School English. Within few decades, the assessments of English learning process and learning outcomes for some aspects are isolated. The guides of English learning ways are teachers performance, students behavior toward English learning, and English learning amenities. Meanwhile in English learning outcomes the indicators are focused on writing. The result of isolating the learning process and outcomes are the students English writing based on authentic mitigated. The research design used is Research and Development (R&D). In this pattern, the development model and its setting are ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Develop, Implement and Evaluate). The products testing are carried out at Grade XI Natural Science of Senior High School in Bangkinang Town. The instruments of the research are observation, tests and questionnaires. The experts of assessments, methodology and English education test the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the model of English learning assessment writing based on authentic. The research finding indicates that the assessments of English learning process and learning outcomes affect to the students English writing based on authentic. The students English mastery is better when these two processes, learning process and learning outcomes are integrated. In conclusion, the assessment of English learning process and English learning outcomes must be comprehensively integrated. This indicates the importance of assessing English learning holistically

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abedi, J. (2004). The no child left behind act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Journal of American EducationalResearch Association, 33, 4-13.

Achmadi SS. (2008), Tata Saji Buku Ajar, Pelatihan Penulisan Buku Ajar: Jakarta

Anwar, Syafri. 2009. Penilaian Berbasis Kompetensi, (Padang: UNP Press)

Bog, C.R. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Ally and Bacon Inc.

Bolt, D.M., Cohen, A.S., & Wollack, J.A. (2001). A mixure item response model for multiple-choice data. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 381- 409.

Borg, W.R., & Gall, M.D. (1983). Educational research: An introduction. (4th ed). New York & London: Longman.

Flannery, K.T. (2000). Contextualizing course evaluations: Using students selfevaluation.Diambil pada tanggal 15 September 2006 dari Sumber: File:/E:Kumpulan JurnalContextualizing Course Evaluation.htm. C 2000 by the Association of Departments of English. All Rights Reserved ADE Bulletin 126 (Fall 2000): 53-57.

Gail (2012). Digital Portopolio. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education, New York.

Ghani, A.R.A., Hari, S., & Suyanto. (Ed). (2006). Evaluasi pendidikan: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jakarta: UHAMKA Press.

Grambs, J.D. & Carr, J.C. (1979). Modern methods in secondary education. New York: Holt,

Gronlund, N.E. (1981). Measurement and evaluation in teaching. (4th ed). New York:Macmillan Publishing. 306

Hamalik, O. (2005). Pendidikan guru: Keterampilan guru. Bandung: Penerbit Mandar Maju

Harjanto .( 2005) . Perencanaan Pengajaran .Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Hasan dan Zainul, A. (1992). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Holman, R. & Berger, M.P.F. (2001). Optimal calibration designs for tests of polytomously scored items described by item response theory models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 361-380.

Hughes, A. (2003). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwa, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Publishers.

Mehrens, W.A. & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation: An educationand psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and winston, Inc.

Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.

New York: SAGE Publications.

Ming-Chung Yu. (2006). On the teaching of L2 sosiolinguistic competence inclassroom settings.

Diambil pada tanggal 8 September 2006, dari file://F:AsianEFL Journal English Language Teaching and Research Articles.htm.

Morse, J.M. (1994). Critical issues in qualitative research methods. London: Sage

Publications.

Naugle, K.A. (2000) . Kirkpatrick's evaluation model as a means of evaluating teacher performance. Diambil pada tanggal 15 November 2005, dari http://www. findarticles.com/p/articles.

Nitko, A.J, 1996. Educational Assessment of Students. 2nd edition. ( New Jersey : Merril and Imprint of Prentice Hall)

OMalley, J.M. & Pierce, L.V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. New York: Addison WesleyLongman, Inc.

Ornstein, A.C. & Hunkins, F.P.1988. Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Engleewood Cliffs, .J.: Prentice Hall.

Ornstein, Allen C, ,Levine Daniel U., Gutek,Gerald L and Vockie, David E. 2007. Foundation of Education. .Belmonth: Wadwarth.

Ornstein, Allan & Hunkins, Francis .P. 2013. Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston:Pearson.

Popham, W.J. (1995). Classroom assessments: What teachers need to know. Toronto: Allyn Bacon.

Prihartono, Nurudin, & Sudaryanto. (2005). Upaya meningkatkan keefektifan pembelajaran Richards, J.C. & Renandya, W.A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J.C. (2006). Curriculum development in language teaching. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sagala, Syaiful. (2011). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Samana, A. (1994). Profesionalisme keguruan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Saukah, A. (1998). Evaluation of pre-departure English training program. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Jilid 5, Nomor Suplemen, 68-83




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v2i2.27

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Journal of English Language Education