The Influence of AI-Powered Translation and Paraphrasing Tools on Academic Writing English Department: A Mixed-Methods Study

Isti Rahma Wijaya

Abstract


Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered technologies are increasingly being employed to help EFL students with academic writing. However, research into the combined use of DeepL and QuillBot during the writing process is sparse. This study looks on students' use and perceptions of DeepL and QuillBot in academic writing. Using a mixed-methods design, quantitative data were gathered from 49 English Education students through a 35-item five-point Likert-scale questionnaire and analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with nine participants and analysed thematically. The data revealed that both instruments were generally viewed positively. DeepL was mostly utilized for translation and phrase improvement during planning and drafting, while QuillBot helped with paraphrasing and editing. Students did not rely solely on AI results; rather, they critically analyzed and corrected generated texts. The study finds that DeepL and QuillBot serve as supportive tools that improve academic writing while allowing students to retain control over content and meaning.


Keywords


Academic Writing; Artificial Intelligence; Deepl; Quillbot; Students’ Perceptions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andriani, A., Fatimah, A. S., & Permatasari, S. A. (2024). Investigating EFL students’ self-efficacy on the use of QuillBot paraphrasing tool in academic writing. English Franca: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v8i1May.8831

Asmara, Y. V, & Kastuhandani, F. C. (2024). Students’ lived experience in utilizing QuillBot as an online paraphrasing tool in academic writing. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education and Culture, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v7i2

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Fitria, T. N. (2021). QuillBot as an online tool: Students’ alternative in paraphrasing and rewriting of English writing. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v9i1.10233

Holmes, W., Luckin, R., & Tuomi, I. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promise and implications for teaching and learning. In UNESCO https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12385.003.0007

Jaladara, A. R., Jafar, M. B., & Salija, K. (2023). QuillBot web-application: Utilizing online technology in academic writing at an Indonesian Islamic higher education. Celebes Journal of Language Studies, 3(2).

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., & Bannert, M. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.

Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of quillbot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852

Lee, S. M. (2020). The impact of using machine translation on EFL students’ writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1553186

Nurmayanti, N., & Suryadi. (2023). The effectiveness of using QuillBot in improving writing for students of English education study program. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.33394/jtp.v8i1.6392

O’Neill, E. M. (2019). Online translator, dictionary, and search engine use among L2 students. CALL-EJ, 20(1), 154–177 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3464055

Payung, & Sukarno. (2025). Enhancing EFL students’ writing skills: The impact of deepl translation. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(1), 483–493. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i1.12301

Purnamawati. (2025). The effect of using deepl on the writing skills of 11th grade students in hospitality major at SMK negeri 1 singaraja. JOEPALLT, 13(1), 126–129 https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v13i1.5047

Rahmani, E. F. (2023). Undergraduate Students’ perceptions on Quillbot paraphrasing tool. Scripta: English Department Journal, 10(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.37729/scripta.v10i2.3674

Suryani, & Fithriani. (2024). No Title.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 37–76) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_18

Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel? ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Yoandita, & Hasnah, Y. (2024). QuillBot as an alternative writing tool: Examining its uses on the academic writing performance of EFL learners. ESTEEM Journal, 7(2).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i5.2772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Isti Rahma Wijaya

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.