Senior High School Students' Comprehension Monitoring and Repair Strategies

Suci Rahmawati, Wahid Hasim, Anne Ratna Suminar

Abstract


Comprehending an English text requires readers not only to construct meaning but also to monitor their understanding and repair comprehension breakdowns as they occur. However, previous research and classroom assessment have often emphasized reading outcomes rather than examining how EFL learners monitor comprehension and select repair strategies during the reading process. This study describes how senior high school students monitored their comprehension and repaired breakdowns while reading an English text. A descriptive qualitative design was employed with six students from one class, using non-participant observation and think-aloud verbalization to capture their reading processes. The data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model of qualitative data analysis. The findings showed that comprehension monitoring was expressed primarily through nonverbal behaviors, including frowning, pausing, and slower reading, rather than explicit verbal statements of understanding or confusion. Repair strategies relied predominantly on rereading, while peer assistance occurred only once, and no students were observed reading ahead, skipping difficult parts, or consulting a dictionary. These findings suggest that students’ repair strategies were relatively limited, highlighting the need for explicit instruction and guided practice in using a wider range of comprehension-monitoring and repair strategies.


Keywords


Comprehension Monitoring; Repair Strategies; Fix-Up Strategies; Think-Aloud Protocol; EFL Reading

Full Text:

PDF

References


Asnidah, S., Paturusi, M. A., & Burhanuddin, W. (2024). The implementation of fix up strategy to students’ reading comprehension skill. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(1), 69–74 https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i1.271

Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.020

Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2017). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding, engagement, and building knowledge, grades k-8. In Strategies That Work https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216029458.ch-003

Heriyawati, D. F., Saukah, A., & Widiati, U. (2018). Working memory capacity, content familiarity, and university EFL students’ reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11458

Husna, Z. F., Wahyuni, S., Rukmini, D., & Wulandari, R. N. (2025). The impact of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v19i2.21061

Li, X., Ahmad, N. K., & Jamil, H. B. (2025). Good vs. Poor Readers’ Strategies in Narrative Comprehension: A Think-Aloud Study among Chinese EFL Learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v13i2.23207

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2

Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2024). Metacognitive reading strategies and their impact on comprehension: Insights from rural EFL learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908

Rachimsyah, A., & Budie Nugroho, M. A. (2026). Students’ metacognitive strategies in learning English reading comprehension in junior high school 5 kuningan on the implementation of the merdeka curriculum. JOLIES: Journal of Linguistic and English Studies, 3(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.33506/jole.v3i1.5464

Rusmiati, R., Irnasari, I., & Akmal, S. (2022). Does the fix-up strategy affect Indonesian EFL learners’ reading comprehension? Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 16(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v16i2.120014

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. In Alfabeta https://doi.org/10.21070/2022/978-623-464-047-2

Sunggingwati, D., & Ungau, S. (2023). Reading strategies used by 12 graders in an EFL context: A correlational study. Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts, 7(2) https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v7i2.9403

Yang, Y.-F. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600846852

Yulita, D., & Napitupulu, M. H. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies in EFL context: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.56773/ierj.v1i1.13

Zargar, E., Adams, A., & Connor, C. M. (2020). The relations between children’s comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i5.3299

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Suci Rahmawati, Wahid Hasim, Anne Ratna Suminar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.