Senior High School Students' Comprehension Monitoring and Repair Strategies
Abstract
Comprehending an English text requires readers not only to construct meaning but also to monitor their understanding and repair comprehension breakdowns as they occur. However, previous research and classroom assessment have often emphasized reading outcomes rather than examining how EFL learners monitor comprehension and select repair strategies during the reading process. This study describes how senior high school students monitored their comprehension and repaired breakdowns while reading an English text. A descriptive qualitative design was employed with six students from one class, using non-participant observation and think-aloud verbalization to capture their reading processes. The data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model of qualitative data analysis. The findings showed that comprehension monitoring was expressed primarily through nonverbal behaviors, including frowning, pausing, and slower reading, rather than explicit verbal statements of understanding or confusion. Repair strategies relied predominantly on rereading, while peer assistance occurred only once, and no students were observed reading ahead, skipping difficult parts, or consulting a dictionary. These findings suggest that students’ repair strategies were relatively limited, highlighting the need for explicit instruction and guided practice in using a wider range of comprehension-monitoring and repair strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asnidah, S., Paturusi, M. A., & Burhanuddin, W. (2024). The implementation of fix up strategy to students’ reading comprehension skill. English Language Teaching Methodology, 4(1), 69–74 https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i1.271
Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. System, 42, 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.020
Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2017). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding, engagement, and building knowledge, grades k-8. In Strategies That Work https://doi.org/10.5040/9798216029458.ch-003
Heriyawati, D. F., Saukah, A., & Widiati, U. (2018). Working memory capacity, content familiarity, and university EFL students’ reading comprehension. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11458
Husna, Z. F., Wahyuni, S., Rukmini, D., & Wulandari, R. N. (2025). The impact of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/lc.v19i2.21061
Li, X., Ahmad, N. K., & Jamil, H. B. (2025). Good vs. Poor Readers’ Strategies in Narrative Comprehension: A Think-Aloud Study among Chinese EFL Learners. International Journal of English Language Education, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v13i2.23207
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2
Pahrizal, N., Vintoni, A., Sotlikova, R., & Ya’akub, H. Z. H. (2024). Metacognitive reading strategies and their impact on comprehension: Insights from rural EFL learners. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 7(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v7i1.23908
Rachimsyah, A., & Budie Nugroho, M. A. (2026). Students’ metacognitive strategies in learning English reading comprehension in junior high school 5 kuningan on the implementation of the merdeka curriculum. JOLIES: Journal of Linguistic and English Studies, 3(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.33506/jole.v3i1.5464
Rusmiati, R., Irnasari, I., & Akmal, S. (2022). Does the fix-up strategy affect Indonesian EFL learners’ reading comprehension? Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 16(2), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v16i2.120014
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. In Alfabeta https://doi.org/10.21070/2022/978-623-464-047-2
Sunggingwati, D., & Ungau, S. (2023). Reading strategies used by 12 graders in an EFL context: A correlational study. Teaching and Learning English in Multicultural Contexts, 7(2) https://doi.org/10.37058/tlemc.v7i2.9403
Yang, Y.-F. (2006). Reading strategies or comprehension monitoring strategies? Reading Psychology, 27(4), 313–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710600846852
Yulita, D., & Napitupulu, M. H. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies in EFL context: A systematic literature review. Indonesian Educational Research Journal, 1(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.56773/ierj.v1i1.13
Zargar, E., Adams, A., & Connor, C. M. (2020). The relations between children’s comprehension monitoring and their reading comprehension and vocabulary knowledge: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing, 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-019-09966-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i5.3299
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Suci Rahmawati, Wahid Hasim, Anne Ratna Suminar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


