Teacher Performance Evaluation at SDN Wawopada Using the Charlotte Danielson Model
Abstract
Teacher performance evaluation is essential for improving education quality. This study evaluates teacher performance at SDN Wawopada using the Charlotte Danielson model, which consists of four domains: Planning and Preparation, Classroom Management, Learning Implementation, and Professional Responsibility. The objective is to analyze teacher performance based on these domains and identify areas for improvement. A mixed-method approach combining quantitative and qualitative methods was employed. Data were collected through document studies, observations, questionnaires, and interviews involving 31 respondents, comprising 9 teachers and 22 students. The collected data were analyzed using statistical and descriptive techniques with SPSS version 27 to determine the percentage of scores and categorize teacher performance. The findings indicate that overall teacher performance falls into the "very good" category. Teachers demonstrate strong capabilities in planning, classroom management, instructional delivery, and professional responsibility. However, a key issue identified is the minimal use of teaching media and technology. Despite advancements in digital education tools, many teachers rely on traditional methods, limiting student engagement and learning outcomes. To enhance teacher performance, it is recommended that teachers receive professional development programs focused on technology integration. Increasing access to teaching media, digital platforms, and innovative pedagogical approaches will further improve instructional quality. This study underscores the importance of continuous teacher evaluation to maintain high educational standards and adapt to evolving teaching methodologies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Asiah, S. (2018). Efektivitas Kinerja Guru. In TADBIR: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam (Vol. 4, Issue 2).
Emda, A. (2017). Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Guru Yang Profesional. In Lantanida Journal (Vol. 4, Issue 2, p. 111). https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v4i2.1883
Eskris, Y., & Iriani, A. (2023). Evaluation of Teacher Performance in Learning in Public Elementary Schools Using the Charlotte Danielson Model. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(12), 3026–3036. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i12.610
Kartomo, A. I., & Slameto, S. (2016). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru Bersertifikasi. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 3(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2016.v3.i2.p219-229
Miftha Huljannah. (2021). Pentingnya Proses Evaluasi Dalam Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Dasar. Educator (Directory of Elementary Education Journal), 2(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.58176/edu.v2i2.157
Muspawi, M. (2021). Strategi Peningkatan Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 21(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i1.1265
Pane, A., & Darwis Dasopang, M. (2017). Belajar Dan Pembelajaran. FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 3(2), 333. https://doi.org/10.24952/fitrah.v3i2.945
Priyanto, E. (2021). Peningkatan Kinerja Guru Dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Melalui Supervisi Akademik. Elementary School: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ke-SD-An, 8(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.31316/esjurnal.v8i1.1077
Rohman, H. (2020). Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal MADINASIKA Manajemen Dan Kelas, 1(2), 92–102. https://ejurnalunma.ac.id/index.php/madinasika
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i2.772
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Theresia Sertika Lagale

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.