Uang Panai: Between Tradition And Perception Among Bugis, Moronene, And Sundanese Culture In Indonesia
Abstract
The "Uang Panai" (bridewealth) custom holds significant cultural weight in various Indonesian ethnic groups, particularly among the Bugis, Moronene, and Sunda. This study investigates the intricate relationship between tradition and contemporary perceptions surrounding Uang Panai in these three distinct communities. Utilizing a qualitative approach with an ethnographic design, the research employed in-depth interviews and participant observation with community elders, young adults, and cultural figures in selected regions of South Sulawesi (Bugis), Southeast Sulawesi (Moronene), and West Java (Sunda). Key findings reveal diverse interpretations and practices of Uang Panai, ranging from its symbolic value as a reflection of family honor and social status among the Bugis, to its more pragmatic function as a shared financial responsibility in the Moronene community. In contrast, the Sundanese perspective, while acknowledging traditional dowry, shows less emphasis on a comparable "Uang Panai" concept, often prioritizing the couple's readiness. The study concludes that while Uang Panai remains a fundamental cultural element, its execution and societal acceptance are continually shaped by evolving socio-economic conditions and generational perceptions, leading to varying degrees of adaptation and preservation across these Indonesian ethnic groups.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ady, B. T., & Nata, A. (2025). Tradition vs. administration: Challenging the cultural barriers to marriage registration in Indonesia. Sakina: Journal of Family Studies, 1(1), 1–15.
Ahmad, A., Said, M., Naharuddin, S. R., Madi, M., & Hidayat, M. N. (2025). Analisis pengaruh inflasi dalam penentuan nominal uang panai pada masyarakat Bugis. Al Maqashidi: Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara, 8(1), 1–20.
Amrullah, U., Habiburrahman, H., & Satriawan, S. (2025). Language, culture, and ethnography of communication. Al-Afkar: Journal for Islamic Studies, 7(3), 1–15.
Angrosino, M. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational research. SAGE Publications.
Collins, R. (1975). Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. Academic Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fitriyani, F. (2022). The Bugis culture in marriage proposal communication (Budaya Bugis dalam proses komunikasi lamaran pernikahan). [Manuscript, publication info not available]
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. Basic Books.
Goode, W. J. (1959). The theoretical importance of love. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089906
Hamidi, S. (2024). The relationship between language, culture, and identity and their influence on one another. ResearchGate. [DOI not available]
Hasbullah, M. (2019). Tradisi perkawinan adat Moronene di Kabupaten Bombana [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Halu Oleo]. e-Skripsi Universitas Halu Oleo.
Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222353
Irfani, H. (2025). Tradisi mahar dalam budaya Sunda ditinjau dari perspektif hukum Islam. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 1(1), 1–18.
Jafar, H., Hamzah, M. A., & Yasin, M. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi besaran uang panai dalam adat perkawinan suku Bugis di Kabupaten Sinjai. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 17(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/jisp.v17i1.xxx
Jariah, R. A., Suharsono, A., & Wardhani, S. (2022). The cultural practice of traditional wedding ceremony in Bima, West Nusa Tenggara. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 9(7), 7856–7862. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v9i07.01
Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Oekonomie. Otto Meissner.
North-Press. (2024). The influence of socio-economic factors on marriage patterns in Indonesia: A quantitative analysis of the relationship between social status and marriage decisions. Social Sciences and Humanities. [DOI or retrieval info not available]
Nuruddin, N., & Nahar, N. (2022). Religious and cultural values in the Mappacci tradition of the Bugis traditional wedding. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 16(2), 173–188.
Rahim, M. (2021). Fungsi dan makna Pabbu'a dalam tradisi perkawinan etnis Moronene. Jurnal Etnologi, 1(1), 45–56.
Rahman, A., Mustofa, N., Nisa, S. S., & Susanto, A. (2024). Nikah muda: The hijrah movement of anti-dating communities from progressive to conservative in Indonesia (A critical study of). Millah, 23(1), 69–84.
ResearchGate. (2020). Tradisi mahar dalam budaya Sunda ditinjau dari perspektif hukum Islam. Retrieved July 24, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346861053
ResearchGate. (2025). Exploring strategies for ending child marriage in Indonesia: A transition from tradition to transformation. Retrieved July 24, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389310933
ResearchGate. (2025). Evolving traditions: The contemporary dynamics of uang panai' in Bugis-Makassar wedding ceremonies. Retrieved July 24, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382122005
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Turner, V. (1967). The forest of symbols: Aspects of Ndembu ritual. Cornell University Press.
UIN Malang Etheses. (2025). Pergeseran makna uang panai dalam tradisi pernikahan masyarakat Bugis: Perspektif konstruksi realitas sosial di Kota Watampone, Sulawesi Selatan [Master’s thesis, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang]. e-Theses UIN Malang. https://doi.org/[DOI pending]
UNICEF. (2020). National strategy on the prevention of child marriage. https://www.unicef.org/indonesia/sites/unicef.org.indonesia/files/2020-06/National-Strategy-on-Child-Marriage-Prevention-2020.pdf
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i5.1488
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Yuliyanah Sain, Tasman Sanhas, Siti Hayatun Nufus, Novita P R, Syarif Amin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


