Exploring Students’ Learning Styles in English Language Learning: Implications for Differentiated Instruction Strategies

Dine Fitriana Rohmah, Fitriah Fitriah, Swasti Marharini

Abstract


Learning styles play an important role in shaping how students process and internalize language input. Information about students’ learning styles enables teachers to select appropriate approaches that address and accommodate their needs. This study investigates the preferred learning styles of junior high school students in English language learning and examines the implications for differentiated instructions. Using a quantitative descriptive design, data were collected from 45 eighth-grade students through a standardized learning style questionnaire adapted from Nisa’ul Kumalasari. The results reveal that seven categories of learning style are identified, namely visual learning, tactile learning, auditory learning, group learning, individual learning, reading learning, and kinesthetic learning. From the seven categories, auditory learning and tactile styles emerged as the two most dominants. These findings indicate that students learn more effectively through listening and collaborative interactions.  This highlights the need for teachers to implement multimodal instructional strategies that integrate auditory, visual, and kinesthetic elements to accommodate diverse student needs and enhance learning engagement.


Keywords


Learning Styles; English Language Learning; Differentiated Instruction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kim, J., & Cho, S. (2023). Enhancing student collaboration and engagement through project-based learning in digital classrooms. Computers & Education, 194, 104670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104670

Lee, H., & Park, J. (2022). The impact of audio-based learning on student engagement in online education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 1675–1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10145-2

Mahmud, N., Putra, A., & Rahmawati, D. (2025). Integrating gamified mobile applications to support multimodal learning in EFL classrooms. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.03

Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108645971

Omar, N., Yusof, N., & Abdullah, S. (2023). Active learning and creativity development through tactile and experiential learning strategies. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100218

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2021). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases revisited. Journal of Engineering Education, 110(2), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20389

Rahman, F., & Setiawan, R. (2020). Collaborative learning practices in Indonesian secondary schools: Opportunities and challenges. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09638-7

Santos, L., & Rios, C. (2025). Virtual simulations as multimodal learning tools in modern education: A systematic review. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 101225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.101225

Zhang, T., Li, X., & Chen, Y. (2024). Exploring the effects of audio-visual materials on learning motivation and comprehension in blended classrooms. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 871–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12145-8




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i6.1659

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Dine Fitriana Rohmah, Fitriah, Swasti Marharini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.