Explainer Video Creation as a Medium for Academic English Development Among Screenagers

Cok Istri Agung Sri Wulandari, Ni Putu Intan Permatasari, I Kadek Dony Suantika, Ida Ayu Fortuna Ningrum

Abstract


In the digital era, screenagers learners immersed in technology prefer interactive and visually engaging learning approaches. This study examines the use of explainer video creation as a medium for developing academic English skills, particularly writing, speaking, and critical thinking. Using a descriptive qualitative design, the study involved 78 second-semester university students enrolled in an Academic English course who completed an explainer video project. Data were collected through video content analysis and open-ended student perception surveys. The study aimed to: (1) investigate how explainer video creation supports academic English development and (2) explore students’ perceptions and challenges during the video creation process. The findings indicate improvement in academic vocabulary use, coherence, pronunciation, and learner engagement. Students reported increased motivation and confidence, as the task required planning, scripting, rehearsing, and revising language output. However, challenges related to technical issues, time management, and collaboration were also identified. Overall, the study highlights the pedagogical potential of student-generated explainer videos in Academic English instruction and suggests that clear rubrics, technical guidance, and structured timelines are essential for maximizing learning outcomes.


Keywords


Explainer Videos; Screenagers; Academic English; Digital Learning; Video-Based Learning; Language Acquisition

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amalia, N., & Pratiwi, D. (2023). Student-generated digital content and EFL learner motivation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 45–57.

Angeli, E., Wagner, J., Lawrick, E., Moore, K., Anderson, M., Soderland, L., & Brizee, A. (2010, May 5). General format. Purdue OWL. http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

Ball, S., Kenny, A., & Gardiner, D. (1990). Literacy, politics and the teaching of English. In I. Goodson & P. Medway (Eds.), Bringing English to order (pp. 47–86). The Falmer Press.

Big drop in students studying O-level literature. (1997, August 16). The Straits Times, p. 3.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Chambers, E., & Gregory, M. (2006). Teaching and learning English literature. Sage.

Chen, L., & Chan, B. (2021). Scaffolding multimodal learning in technology-enhanced environments. Computers & Education, 166, 104–155.

Choo, S. (2004). Investigating ideology in the literature curriculum in Singapore (Unpublished master’s thesis). National University of Singapore.

Choo, S. (2011). On literature’s use(ful/less)ness: Reconceptualising the literature curriculum in the age of globalisation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 47–67.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (2007). Literature in English: Teaching syllabus. Ministry of Education.

Fosnot, C. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press.

Hafner, C. (2021). Integrating multimodal composing in EAP. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 1–10.

Hafner, C., & Miller, L. (2020). Understanding multimodal composing in EFL contexts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 1–12.

He, T., & Ju, X. (2022). Developing critical thinking through multimodal tasks. Language Teaching Research, 26(5), 953–972.

Hyland, K. (2022). Second language writing (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Jewitt, C. (2020). Multimodal learning and literacy. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 377–389.

Lai, C. (2021). Digital natives’ learning preferences in technology-integrated environments. Computers & Education, 165, 104–145.

Lambert, V., & Lambert, C. (2012). Qualitative descriptive research: An acceptable design. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research, 16(4), 255–256.

Lestari, P., & Widodo, H. (2021). Challenges in multimodal assignments in EFL classrooms. TESOL International Journal, 16(4), 56–72.

Lim, F. V., & Chan, B. (2022). Multimodal literacy in English language education. TESOL Quarterly, 56(3), 1025–1047.

Mahapatra, S. (2021). Explainer videos as instructional tools in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Media, 48(2), 145–160.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.

Palfrey, J., & Gasser, U. (2016). Born digital: How children grow up in a digital age. Basic Books.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544.

Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). The role of multimodal composing in developing EFL learners' writing. System, 100, 102556.

Setiawan, A., & Irawan, Y. (2022). Digital-based English learning in Indonesian universities. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(4), 789–798.

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2023). Multimodal composition and academic vocabulary development. System, 114, 102–121.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i1.1850

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Cok Istri Agung Sri Wulandari, Ni Putu Intan Permatasari, I Kadek Dony Suantika, Ida Ayu Fortuna Ningrum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.