The Impact of Google Gemini Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Instruction on Students’ Paragraph Writing Ability
Abstract
The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in language education has drawn significant attention to its potential to support students’ writing development. This study investigates the impact of Gemini AI–assisted instruction on students’ paragraph writing ability using a one-shot case study experimental design. Gemini AI was integrated into the instructional process for undergraduate students enrolled in a paragraph writing course. Following the intervention, 28 students completed a post-test in the form of a paragraph writing task. Their writing was evaluated using an analytical scoring rubric focusing on coherence, organization, vocabulary use, grammatical accuracy, and unity. The findings indicate that Gemini AI provided effective scaffolding during the writing process, as students demonstrated satisfactory to strong performance, particularly in organization, idea development, and coherence. Although the one-shot design limits causal interpretation due to the absence of a pre-test and control group, the results offer initial empirical evidence of the pedagogical potential of Gemini AI in paragraph writing instruction. The study therefore recommends further research using more rigorous experimental designs and highlights the importance of integrating AI tools in a careful and pedagogically informed manner.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed and R. Islam. (2024). “Gemini-the most powerful LLM: Myth or Truth,”. doi: 10.36227/techrxiv.171177477.70151414/v1.
Alpar, Ö. (2025). Evaluating generative AI tools for improving English writing skills: A comparison of ChatGPT-4, Gemini, and Copilot. European Journal of Educational Research.
Ananda, D. R. (2024). Students’ Perception on AI Technology: Google Gemini as a Writing Assistant Tool. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 12(1), 46-54. https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v12i1.24393
Antonietti, A., Colombo, B., & Lozza, E. (2023). Artificial intelligence in education: A review on recent applications and future prospects. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100141.
Arbel, Y. (2024). Evaluating the potential of large language models for vestibular rehabilitation education: a comparison of chatgpt, google gemini, and clinicians.. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.24.24301737
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
B. D. Wale and Y. F. Kassahun. (2024). “The Transformative Power of AI Writing Technologies: Enhancing EFL Writing Instruction through the Integrative Use of Writerly and Google Docs,” Hum. Behav. Emerg. Technol., vol. 2024. doi: 10.1155/2024/9221377.
Baskara, F. R. (2025). ChatGPT and Google Gemini in EFL Education: A Qualitative Exploration of Pedagogical Efficacy among Indonesian Sophomores. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 13(1), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v13i1.9926
Baytak, A. (2024). The Content Analysis of the Lesson Plans Created by ChatGPT and Google Google Gemini. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 9(1), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.2024.19
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dangin, A. E., Triyono, T., & Mukminan, M. (2023). The effectiveness of AI-powered writing tools in enhancing students’ writing performance. International Journal of Language Teaching, 12(1), 34–45.
E. Supriyadi, P. Studi, T. Industri, S. Tinggi, and T. Bandung. (2024). “Exploring Google Bard’s (Gemini) Role In Enhancing Research Articles in Computational Thinking And Mathematics Education, J. Math. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 28–37.
Fareed, M., Ashraf, A., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL learners’ writing skills: Problems, factors, and suggestions. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81–92.
Hikmah, N. (2024). The advantages and disadvantages of AI writing tools in academic writing. Journal of English Language Studies, 9(2), 78–86.
Imran, A., & Almusharraf, N. M. (2024). The impact of AI Gemini on students’ writing quality: A case study. AI in Education Journal, 3(1), 12–21.
Imran, M., Almusharraf, N. (2024). Google Gemini as a next generation AI educational tool: a review of emerging educational technology. Smart Learn. Environ. 11, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00310-z
J. Rudolph, S. Tan, and S. Tan. (2023). “War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 364–389. doi: 10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.23.
J. Shopovski. (2024). “Generative Artificial Intelligence, AI for Scientific Writing: A Literature Review. doi: 10.20944/preprints202406.0011.v1.
Kartika, S. (2024). Enhancing writing proficiency through AI-powered feedback: A quasi-experimental study using Google Gemini. LinguaEducare: Journal of English and Linguistic Studies, 1(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.63324/h6q1ak58 DOI: https://doi.org/10.63324/h6q1ak58
Kartika, N. (2024). Students’ perception of AI Gemini in writing practice. Journal of Language and Technology Integration, 2(1), 55–64.
Lang, G., Triantoro, T., & Sharp, J. H. (2024). Large language models as AI-powered educational assistants: Comparing GPT-4 and Gemini for writing teaching cases. Journal of Information Systems Education, 35(3), 390-407. https://doi.org/10.62273/YCIJ6454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.62273/YCIJ6454.
Link, S., Dursun, A., Karakaya, K., & Hegelheimer, V. (2020). Towards best ESL writing classroom practices with automated feedback tools. Language Learning & Technology, 24(1), 26–44.
M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, M. I. Loaiza-Aguirre, A. Zúñiga-Ojeda, and M. Portuguez-Castro. (2021). “Characterization of the teaching profile within the framework of education 4.0,” Futur. Internet, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.3390/fi13040091.
Majidah., Rullyana, G., & Triandari, R. (2025). Google Gemini as a Learning Assistant: Exploring Student Perceptions. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), 9(2), 163-172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v9i2.10008Phan, T. T., & Tran, V. D. T. (2025). AI Tools in the Development of Supporting Sentences: Insights from Paragraph Writing Classes in an EFL Context. International Journal of Digital Learning on Languages and Arts, 2(2), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijodlla.v2i2.101756
Nguyen, D. L., Le, P. T. T., & Le, T. T. (2025). Using Gemini for formative assessment in English academic writing: Critical insights into the AI tool’s efficacy. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 16(1), 328-343. https://doi.org/10.54855/acoj.2516117
Nunan, D., et al. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2006). Writing academic English (4th ed.). Pearson Longman.
Perera, P., & Lankathilaka, M. (2023). Preparing to Revolutionize Education with the Multi-Model GenAI Tool Google Gemini? A Journey towards Effective Policy Making. J Adv Educ Philos, 7(8): 7(8): 246-253.
Rane, S., Gupta, R., & Sharma, P. (2024). AI Gemini: A multimodal language model for enhanced learning applications. Journal of Educational Technology and AI, 6(1), 1–10.
Sobaih, A. E. E., Hasanein, A. M., & Abu Elnasr, A. E. (2025). Exploring students' over-reliance on AI writing tools: Implications for academic integrity. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 18(1), 23–34.
Utami, D. A., Fadhilah, A. N., & Lestari, M. (2023). Students’ experiences in using AI-based writing assistants in academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 121–130.
Wei L (2023) Artificial intelligence in language instruction: impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Front. Psychol. 14:1261955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i2.2307
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Sri Yuliani, Annisa Mardatillah, Shalawati, Dicki Hartanto, Masrul, Lisa Dwiyanti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



