Appropriating Grammar as a Tool in Writing Activities: Student's Perception

Elya Kristian Fernando, Maman Suryaman


This study explores the motivations and perspectives of 2 university students in Indonesia. In this research, author employed qualitative design with the research method "Interview Study". The author collects data using Semi-structured Interviews, meanwhile, the author uses Thematic Analysis by Braun and Clarke for data analysis. It was found that the use of Grammarly independently by the participants was motivated by feedback from the teacher, belief in learning, feedback preference and English proficiency. In addition, their abilities also shape their perspective on the features provided by Grammarly. Students’ AWE appropriation is influenced by their belief about learning, preference on feedback and language proficiency


EFL; Grammarly; Perspective; Automated Writing Evaluation

Full Text:



Abu Seileek, A. F. (2009). The effect of using an online-based course on the learning of grammar inductively and deductively. ReCALL, 21(3), 319–336.

Aidil, T. (2021). Exploring Students’ Perception On The Effectiveness Of “Grammarly Software” In Academic Writing. UIN Ar-Raniry.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Burns, C., Brady, M., Dunn, A., Starr, N., Blosser, C., & Garzon, D. (2012). Pediatric Primary Care (5th ed.). Saunders.

Cavaleri, M., & Dianati, S. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), 223–236.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Cushing, I., & Helks, M. (2021). Exploring primary and secondary students’ experiences of grammar teaching and testing in England. English in Education, 55(3), 239–250.

DeVito, J. A. (2011). Human Communication: The Basic Course (12th ed.). Pearson Education.

Ene, E., & Kosobucki, V. (2016). Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer. Assessing Writing, 30, 3–20.

Fahmi, M. A., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). EFL students’ perception on the use of Grammarly and teacher feedback. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 18–25.

Harvey-Scholes, C. (2018). Computer-assisted detection of 90% of EFL student errors. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(1–2), 144–156.

Huang, H.-W., Li, Z., & Taylor, L. (2020). The Effectiveness of Using Grammarly to Improve Students’ Writing Skills. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning, 122–127.

Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2020). Appropriating automated feedback in L2 writing: experiences of Chinese EFL student writers. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–25.

Kahraman, A., & Yalvaç, F. (2015). EFL Turkish University Students’ Preferences about Teacher Feedback and its Importance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 73–80.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Lailika, H. I. (2019). Students’ Perceptions Of The Use Of Grammarly As An Online Grammar Checker In Thesis Writing [Universitas Islam Negerisunan Ampel Surabaya].

Lawley, J. (2015). New software to help EFL students self-correct their writing. Language Learning & Technology. Language Learning & Technology, 19(1), 23–33.

Lindawati, N., & Sengkey, F. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Inggris dengan Teknik Role Play pada Siswa Kelas X SMA Dwijendra Denpasar. Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Hotel, 3(1), 1–8.

May, M. (2007). Sensation and perception (E. H. Chudler (ed.)). Chelsea House Pub.

McAlexander, P. J. (2000). Checking the Grammar Checker: Integrating Grammar Instruction with Writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 19(2), 124–140.

Nova, M. (2018). Utilizing grammarly in evaluating academic writing: a narrative research on efl students’ experience. Premise : Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 80–96.

Noviabahari, J. L. (2010). The analysis of grammatical error in recount text by the first year students of SMA Wachid Hasyim 2 Taman Sidoarjo [IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.].

Nugraha, U. (2015). Hubungan Persepsi, Sikap Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Olahraga Dan Kesehatan Universitas Jambi. Cerdas Sifa Pendidikan, 4(1).

ONeill, R., & Russell, A. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1).

Pujiawati, N. (2018). Mengintegrasikan automatic grammar checker dalam kelas menulis. JUDIKA, 6(1), 1–11.

Puspitasari, D. (2013). Grammatical Errors Made By The Second Semester Students In Writing Ii Subject In The English Education Department Of Yogyakarta State University In The Academic Year Of 2012/ 2013 [Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta].

Qassemzadeh, A., & Soleimani, H. (2016). The Impact of Feedback Provision by Grammarly Software and Teachers on Learning Passive Structures by Iranian EFL Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(9), 1884.

Thoha, M. (2008). Perilaku organisasi : konsep dasar dan aplikasinya. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Yang, H.-J. (2018). Efficiency of Online Grammar Checker in English Writing Performance and Students’ Perceptions. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 18(3), 328–348.

Yarrow, R. (2007). How do Students Feel about Grammar?: The Framework and its Implications for Teaching and Learning. Changing English, 14(2), 175–186.

Zhan, L. (2016). Written Teacher Feedback: Student Perceptions, Teacher Perceptions, and Actual Teacher Performance. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 73.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2022 Elya Kristian Fernando, Maman Suryaman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.