Students’ Perspective and Experiences of Using Grammarly in Writing Thesis Backgrounds

Tiara Wijayani Salsabilla, Maulina Maulina, Ririn Syahriani

Abstract


Writing the background section of a thesis could be a challenge for final-year students, especially when it comes to using correct grammar and constructing a logical flow. Grammarly, a widely used grammar checking tool, is often relied upon to improve writing quality. This study aims to find out English Education students' perspectives and experiences of using Grammarly to help them write their thesis background. Using a descriptive qualitative method, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with six final-year students who had used the free version of Grammarly. The findings revealed that Grammarly effectively detects basic grammatical errors such as tenses, punctuation, and article usage, and increases students’ writing confidence. However, limitations include feature restrictions, dependency on internet access, and occasional inaccuracy in feedback. Students found Grammarly helpful as a preparatory tool, but acknowledged it cannot replace supervisor feedback. In conclusion, Grammarly supports grammar correction and confidence-building but should be used as a complementary, not a substitute, academic writing aid.

Keywords


Grammarly, Academic Writing, Grammar Accuracy, Thesis Background, Education Tool.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akbar, M. H. (2023). The Use of Grammarly as a Grammar Online Checker for Students’ Thesis Writing. Presented to State Islamic Institute of Ponorogo in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Sarjana in English Language Teaching Department English Languag Tea. http://etheses.iainponorogo.ac.id/id/eprint/25297

Astuti, D., Darmahusni, D., Sumarni, S., Suseno, M. (2023). The Use of Grammarly in the Academic Writing of Undergraduate Students: Advantages, Weaknesses, and Challenges ( Systematic Review ). English Language and Literature International Conference (Ellic) Proceedings, 6, 593–607. https://jurnal.unimus.ac.id/index.php/ELLIC/article/view/12570

Cavaleri, M. (2016). You want me to check your grammar again ? The usefulness of an online grammar checker as perceived by students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 10(1), 223–236. https://journal.aall.org.au/index.php/jall/article/view/393

Chairunnisa, C. (2024). Pengaruh Perkembangan Teknologi Informasi Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Al-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 4(2), 1636–1648. https://doi.org/10.37680/almikraj.v4i02.5362

Dewi, U. (2022). Grammarly as Automated Writing Evaluation: Its Effectiveness from EFL Students’ Perceptions. LinguaCultura, 16 (2), 155-161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315

Darmalaksana, W. (2024). Penyusunan Latar Belakang Penelitian Dianggap Bagian Tersulit dalam Pembelajaran Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah. In Gunung Djati Conference Series, 37, 141-148. https://conferences.uinsgd.ac.id/index.php/gdcs/article/view/2095

Driane, L. A., Roza, V., & Melani, M. (2024). EFL Students’ Perceptions on Using Grammarly in Thesis Writing at English Education Department Students. Continuous Education: Journal of Science and Research, 5(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.51178/ce.v5i1.1785

Ghani, M. N., Kurniawati, A., & Azizah, S. (2023). Opini Mahasiswa Mengenai Penghapusan Kebijakan Wajib Skripsi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 2, 417–424. https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/sniis/article/view/821

Harahap, S. H., Cristin, M., Aritonang, T. C., Situmorang, A., & Tio, R. (2024). Dampak Teknologi pada Proses Penulisan dan Publikasi Akademik. Journal on Education, 06(04), 22738–22746. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.6293

Haris, I., Kusumarini, E., Zagoto, S. F. L., Kusumawati, I., & Arifudin, O. (2023). Pengenalan Teknis Penggunaaan Software Turnitin Dan Mendeley Dekstop Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Karya Ilmiah Mahasiswa Baru. Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 3(2), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.31004/jh.v3i2.187

Hasan, N., Sutaryo., Asrul. (2021). The Use of “Grammarly” Application as Electronic Feedback on Students’ Writing of English Thesis at Universities in Ternate. Jurnal Bilingual, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.33387/j.bilingual.v11i1.3377

Kaharuddin, N. N. (2018). Kendala Kebahasaan dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah Berupa Skripsi Bagi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Idiomatik: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(1), 41–46. https://ejournals.umma.ac.id/index.php/idiomatik

Maulina, M., Ignacio, J. F., Bersabe, L. A. C., Serrano, A. J. D., Carpio, N. G., & Santos, E. G. D. (2022). Technology-based media used in teaching listening skills. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 11(1), 85-99. https://journal.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/exposure/article/view/6564

Miles, M. B. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A Methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks.

Muspawi, M., Hidayat, A., Yosefa, A., Ronansyah, M. F., & Nurmawan, M. (2023). Perspektif Para Peneliti Senior Tentang Penyusunan Latar Belakang Penelitian yang Baik. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 23(3), 2691–2694. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v23i3.4547

Moon, J. (2007). Critical thinking: An exploration of theory and practice. Routledge.

O’Neill, R., & Russell, A. M. T. (2019). Stop! Grammar time: University students’ perceptions of the automated feedback program Grammarly. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3795

Pane, I. I. I., Alvindi, A., Dimas, D., & Sadri, I. (2025). Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Grammarly as a Tool for Enhancing Grammar Accuracy in Writing. Vision, 20(2), 90-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/vis.v20i2.4192

Putra, M. T. I., Maulina, M., Muthmainah, M., Asrifan, A., Apriani, E., Ejica, N. C. P., & Peroddin, A. D. D. (2021). Teaching Communicative Grammar: A Literature Review. CAPE COMORIN: An International Multidisciplinary Double-Blind Peer-reviewed Research Journal, 3(02), 63-68. http://repository.iaincurup.ac.id/id/eprint/533

Qub'a, A. A., Guba, M. N. A., & Fareh, S. (2024). Exploring the use of Grammarly in assessing English academic writing. Heliyon, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34893

Rababah, L. M., & Talafha, D. K. (2024). Unlocking Writing Potential : Assessing the Impact of Grammarly on Jordanian EFL Students ’ Writing Proficiency. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 14(5), 1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1405.21

Rahmi, M. (2023). An Analysis of Students ’ Grammatical Error Identified by Grammarly. (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh). https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/34542

Rasyiid, R. N., & Maulina, M., Resueňo, C. P., Nasrullah, R., & Rusli, T. I. (2021). Instagram Usage in Learning English: A Literature Review. Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, 9(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v9i2.9482

Samuel, V., Sevat, M., & Antoni, A. A. (2024). Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa Pada Proposal Penelitian Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Medan. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 7(4), 15020–15025. https://jurnalstkipmelawi.ac.id/index.php/JDPM/article/download/2802/pdf

Saputro, R. E., Utomo, F. S., Putranto, R. V. M., & Filanzi, S. (2024). Optimalisasi kemampuan menulis akademik melalui teknologi AI : kolaborasi Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka dan Universitas Amikom Purwokerto. Selaparang: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 8(4), 3206–3213. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v8i4.26335

Setyani, E. D., Bunau, E., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2023). The Influence of Grammarly towards Indonesian EFL Students’ First-Degree Thesis Writing Confidence. Elsya : Journal of English Language Studies, 5(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.31849/elsya.v5i1.6773

Susetyo, & Noermanzah. (2020). Kemampuan dan Kesulitan Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Universitas Bengkulu dalam Menulis Proposal Penelitian Skripsi. Silampari Bisa, 3(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v3i2.1071

Susmita, N. (2022). Ketidakefektifan Kalimat pada Latar Belakang Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia STKIP. 5(2), 145–149. https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v5i2.9719




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i3.968

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Tiara Wijayani Salsabilla, Maulina, Ririn Syahriani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.