Teacher's Use and Students’ Perception on Oral Corrective Feedback in English Morning Program (EMO)

Moh Nawawi Ivan, Lukman Hakim

Abstract


Speaking is a crucial skill for effective communication, especially for learners using a non-native language. In this study, we investigate the types of oral corrective feedback (OCF) used by English teachers and students' perceptions of when this feedback should be given. The research employs a descriptive qualitative design, focusing on 2 English teachers and 35 students from seven majors at SMK Bhakti Mulia Pare, Kediri, specifically in the English Morning Program (EMO). Data were collected through observations, interviews, and questionnaires. The questionnaire, comprising 15 items, used a Likert Scale to gauge students' feelings about OCF, their perceptions of it, and how they believe it should be delivered. The study finds that Teacher A predominantly used recasts, while Teacher B utilized both recasts and repetition. Recasts involve incorporating the content of the incorrect utterance into a corrected version. Additionally, the questionnaire results indicate that over 68.1% of students agreed with the feedback provided by their teachers. The findings suggest that oral corrective feedback is beneficial and can enhance students' speaking competence.

Keywords


Oral Corrective Feedback; Types of OCF; Students’ Perceptions; Speaking Competence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhadad, M. A., Mustofa, M., & Karimullah, I. W. (n.d.). Exploring the Benefits of English Entertainment Exposure as Language Acquisition.

Annie, T. S. Y. (2011). Exploring Students’ Perception of and Reaction to Feedback in School–based Assessment. 7.

Azad, A. K. (2016). Bangladeshi EFL Learners’ Perceptions and Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback. 10(2).

Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1305–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.191

Elis R, & Sheen Y. (2011). Corrective Feedback Language Teacing. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning.

Jack C. Richards. (n.d.). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kassa, A. A. (2011). Oral Corrective Feedback: An Exploratory Case Study of the Interplay Between Teachers’ Beliefs, Classroom Practices, and Rationales.

Katayama, A. (2007). A. Katayama 2007.pdf. Asian EFL Journal (Conference Proceedings Volume English as an International Language: Setting the Standards), 9(No. 4).

Laeli, A. F., & Setiawan, S. (2019). Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Class: Its Frequency, Students’ Perceptions and Preference. EXPOSURE : JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS, 8(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v8i2.2785

Lewis, M. (2002). Giving Feedback In Language Classes. Seameo Regional Language Center.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective Feedback and Learner Uptake: Negotiation of Form Incommunicative Classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Edition 3). Sage.

Papangkorn, P. (2015). SSRUIC Students’ Attitude and Preference Toward Error Corrections. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1841–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.244

Rusma. (2013). Computer-Based Learning and Learning to Develop 21st Century Professionalism. Alfabeta.

Septiana, Y., Bukhari, D., & Heriansyah, H. (2016). Students’ Perceptions on Teacher’s Oral Feedback. Research in English and Education (READ), 1.

Solikhah, I., & Surakarta, I. (n.d.). Oral Corrective Feedback in a Speaking Class.

Widia, S., Mukhaiyar, & Ratmanida. (2018). Engglis Theachers’ Strategies Giving Oral Corrative Feedback On Students’ Speaking Performance. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-6).

Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish (Second edition). The Guilford Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i5.546

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Moh. Nawawi Ivan, Lukman Hakim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.