Presupposition in Kamala Harris’ Statements in the 2024 United States Presidential Debate

Muhammad Fahriza, Ruminda Ruminda, Cipto Wardoyo

Abstract


Debate is basically an exchange of opinions on a subject by giving reasons to defend each other's ideas. In the election context, debates are often related to social, political, and economic issues to gain audience votes. The purpose of this study is to explore what presuppositions were used by Harris in the 2024 U.S. presidential debate. The researcher used a qualitative methodology and presented the results descriptively. The results found that there were 16 existential, 45 factive, 8 lexical, 5 structural, 3 non-factive, and 0 counter-factual presuppositions. Based on these findings, the researcher concludes that Harris, in the debate against Trump, used concrete sentences that contain facts. This shows that Harris influenced the audience using assumptions that could not be directly refuted by the voters.


Keywords


Presupposition, USA, Presidential debate, Kamala Harris.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Gublan, B. K. (2015). A Pragmatic Study of a Political Discourse from the Perspective of the Linguistic Adaptation Theory. International Journal of English Linguistics, 5(2).

Cooper, D. E. (2018). Presupposition. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.

Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & David, W. (2016). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11275-2

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Methods Research. In SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbe.4.485.1

Elshehry, S. S. (2018). A Pragmatic Analysis of the Translation of Presuppositions: A Case Study of Four Political Speeches [Effat University]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14131/335

Grice, H. paul. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Brill. https://doi.org/10.2307/324613

Huang, Y. (2007). Pragmatics (Oxford Tex). Oxford University Press.

Kroeger, P. R. (2023). Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics. Language science press.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. In Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00076667

Potts, C. (2015). Presupposition and Implicature. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741326-005

Rashkin, H., Choi, E., Jang, J. Y., Volkova, S., & Choi, Y. (2017). Truth of Varying Shades: Analyzing Language in Fake News and Political Fact-Checking. EMNLP 2017 - Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings, 2931–2937. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d17-1317

Sarah, B., & Murana, M. oladayo. (2018). Language In Political Discourse: A Pragmatic Study Of Presupposition And Politeness In The Inaugural Speech Of President Donald Trump. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies, 1(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.31559/baes2018.1.1.6

ThePrint. (2024). Trump Vs Harris| Full 2024 Presidential Debate. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6Pc6YRgDqo&list=LL&index=13&t=5156s

Viebahn, E. (2020). Lying with Presuppositions. Nous, 54(3), 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12282

Youssef, S., & Albarakati, M. (2020). Presupposition Use in Arabic Political Discourse: The Case of King Salman Speech on Terrorism. International Journal of English Linguistics, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v11n1p22

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i3.846

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Fahriza, Ruminda Ruminda, Cipto Wardoyo

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.