Formal and Informal Language Features in Students’ Academic Writing of Fourth-Semester EFL Students

Angelica Angelica, Sumarni Sumarni, Yanti Sri Rezeki

Abstract


Academic writing requires clarity, precision, and objectivity, which can be achieved through formal language. However, students often apply informal language in their actual practices. This descriptive qualitative research analyzed the dominant type of language features utilized by 23 fourth-semester students. It also analyzed the rhetorical purposes for which they utilized them. Additionally, this study explored students’ awareness of using formal language features and avoiding informal ones in their academic writing. Data were collected from argumentative essay assignments and a questionnaire. The findings indicate the predominantly utilized formal language features in their essays. These included precise wording (with lexical density greater than 61%), passive voice, and hedging. The informal language features predominantly applied were colloquial expressions, followed by two-word verbs, idiomatic expressions, and contractions. This study contributes to the existing literature on academic writing. It also provides information to improve academic writing courses and guides students toward more formal academic writing.


Keywords


Academic Writing; Formal Language Features; Informal Language Features

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhtar, R., & Riaz, M. (2019). Formality in Academic Writing: Investigating Stylistic Competence of Undergraduate EFL Learners. UW Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–2. Retrieved from https://uwjss.org.pk/index.php/ojs3/article/view/59

Alangari, M., Jaworska, S., & Laws, J. (2020). Who’s afraid of phrasal verbs? The use of phrasal verbs in expert academic writing in the discipline of linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100814

Bailey, S. (2018). Academic writing a handbook for international students (5th ed.). Routledge.

Constantinou, F., Chambers, L., Zanini, N., & Klir, N. (2019). A diachronic perspective on formality in students’ writing: Empirical findings from the UK. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 33(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1563609

Gherdan, M. E. (2019). Hedging in academic discourse. Romanian Journal of English Studies, 16, 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1515/RJES-2019-0015

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday's introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Liardét, C. L., Black, S., & Bardetta, V. S. (2019). Defining formality: Adapting to the abstract demands of academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 146–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.007

Matias, F. M. (2023). Impact of internet slang on the academic writing of Computer Science Students. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Science (ARJHSS), 6(7), 44–54. www.arjhss.com

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mullany, L., & Stockwell, P. (2015). Introducing English language: A resource book for students. Routledge.

Murray, R., & Moore, S. (2006). The handbook of academic writing: A fresh approach. Open University Press.

Oktafiandi, R., Sofian, S., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2024). Analysis on the problems in writing references of undergraduate students’ research proposal. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Education (JEFLE), 2(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.26418/jefle.v2i2.51586

Praminatih, G. A., Kwary, D. A., & Ardaniah, V. (2019). Is EFL students’ academic writing becoming more informal? Journal of World Languages, 5(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2019.1570664

Rastri, A., Rezeki, Y. S., Salam, U., Riyanti, D., & Surmiyati, S. (2023). An analysis of students’ problems in writing a research proposal. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v5i1.3479

Santri, M., Ikhsanudin, I., & Rezeki, Y. S. (2022). Student’s strategies in coping with english writing anxiety. Journey: Journal of English and Pedagogy, 5(2), 160 168. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.uibu.ac.id/index.php/journey/index

Shaikh, S., Yayilgan, S. Y., Klimova, B., & Pikhart, M. (2023). Assessing the usability of ChatGPT for formal English language learning. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(9), 1937–1960. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13090140

Sheehy, M., Wray, C., Fay, F., Lynch, M., Neylon, J., O'Donnell, T., O'Donovan, C., & Quinlan, C. (2019). Academic writing handbook for learners in the Further Education and Training (FET) sector. Further Education Support Service (FESS) & Education and Training Boards Ireland (ETBI)

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication, 33(2), 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527

Wahyuni, R., Clarry, S., & Dwi, R. (2022) An analysis of students’ problems in writing essays, 7(12). http://dx.doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i6

Wallwork, A. (2023). English for research: Usage, style, and grammar. Springer.

Zarefsky, D. (2014). Rhetorical perspectives on argumentation: Selected essays. Springer.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i5.1360

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Angelica Angelica, Sumarni Sumarni, Yanti Sri Rezeki

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.